Share This

Hot News

BREAKING: Philippines lifts COVID-19 travel ban vs Taiwan @ 2020-02-14 20:05 Back Hot News
Keyword:travel ban
Concept:
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PANEL VOTED ALONG PARTY LINES IN FAVOUR OF ADVANCING THE "NO BAN ACT", WHICH WAS INTRODUCED AMID WIDESPREAD OUTRAGE OVER TRUMP"S TRAVEL BAN. THE MEASURE NOW MOVES TO THE FULL HOUSE.
CALIFORNIA BANNED TAXPAYER-FUNDED TRAVEL TO ALL BUT TWO TARGETED STATES FOR THEIR ACTIONS TO PROTECT RELIGIOUS LIBERTY. CALIFORNIA ADDED IOWA AND NORTH CAROLINA TO THE TRAVEL BAN FOR BUCKING THE LGBT POLITICAL AGENDA ON SEX-REASSIGNMENT SURGERY AND PUBLIC RESTROOM USE, RESPECTIVELY.
MANILA/TAIPEI (REUTERS) - THE PHILIPPINES WILL LIFT A TRAVEL BAN IT HAD IMPOSED ON VISITORS FROM TAIWAN IN A BID TO CONTROL THE SPREAD OF THE CORONAVIRUS, A SENIOR PHILIPPINE OFFICIAL AND TAIWAN’S OFFICIAL NEWS AGENCY SAID ON FRIDAY.
AUSTRALIAN UNIVERSITIES COUNT COST OF CORONAVIRUS TRAVEL BAN
THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT HAS EXTENDED ITS TRAVEL BAN ON PEOPLE WHO HAVE TRAVELLED THROUGH CHINA BY ANOTHER WEEK, SCOTT MORRISON HAS ANNOUNCED.
FILIPINO WORKERS STRANDED IN MANILA ASK WORLD COURT TO OVERTURN DUTERTE』S HONG KONG TRAVEL BAN
THE POLICY IS IN PLACE BASED ON THE GOVERNMENT-IMPOSED TRAVEL BAN TO AND FROM MAINLAND CHINA SINCE FEB. 5, THAT BARS TRAVELERS WHO HAVE VISITED CHINA OVER THE PAST 14 DAYS FROM VISITING OR TRANSITING IN INDONESIA, AND ALSO HALTS THE PROVISION OF VISA-FREE AND VISA-ON-ARRIVAL FACILITIES FOR CHINESE CITIZENS.
AND WHILE TRAVEL BANS ARE FREQUENTLY USED TO STOP THE SPREAD OF AN EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASE, A NEW UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON AND JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY STUDY OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH FOUND THAT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAVEL BANS IS MOSTLY UNKNOWN.
THE US CORONAVIRUS TRAVEL BAN COULD BACKFIRE. HERE"S HOW
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PROVOKED ANOTHER INTERNATIONAL OUTCRY WHEN IT ANNOUNCED LATE LAST MONTH THAT IT WAS ADDING SIX NEW COUNTRIES TO ITS LIST OF NATIONS THAT FACE BROAD TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS TO THE UNITED STATES: ERITREA, KYRGYZSTAN, MYANMAR, NIGERIA, SUDAN AND TANZANIA. THE EXPANSION OF THE TRAVEL BAN, WHICH PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP FIRST ISSUED AS AN EXECUTIVE ORDER JUST DAYS AFTER HIS INAUGURATION IN JANUARY 2017, WILL TAKE EFFECT ON FEB. 22.
THAT MORNING, ON FEB. 2, PRESIDENT RODRIGO DUTERTE OF THE PHILIPPINES HAD ANNOUNCED A TEMPORARY TRAVEL BAN THAT BARRED FLIGHTS ARRIVING FROM MAINLAND CHINA, HONG KONG AND MACAU. AT THE AIRPORT, OFFICIALS TOLD MS. DORINGO THAT THE BAN ALSO APPLIED TO FILIPINO TRAVELERS GOING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.
ACCORDING TO IMMIGRATION LAWYER LEILA MANSOURI, WHO HAS HANDLED CASES FOR IRANIANS AND IRANIAN AMERICANS AFFECTED BY THE 2017 MUSLIM BAN THAT RESTRICTED TRAVELLERS FROM IRAN AND SEVERAL OTHER MUSLIM-MAJORITY COUNTRIES, THE TEXT OF THE RECENT TRAVEL BAN IS NOT CLEAR ON WHETHER NIGERIANS WITH NON-IMMIGRANT VISAS ARE BARRED FROM APPLYING FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCY.
TRUMP TRAVEL BAN, PART II
THE RACISM AT THE HEART OF TRUMP』S 『TRAVEL BAN』
LAST FRIDAY, THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION EXPANDED ITS 2017 TRAVEL BAN — WHICH RESTRICTED IMMIGRATION FROM SEVEN MUSLIM-MAJORITY COUNTRIES — TO INCLUDE SIX MORE COUNTRIES, INCLUDING NIGERIA, AFRICA』S MOST POPULOUS NATION. WHILE THIS NEW POLICY HAS SUSPENDED NIGERIAN PATHWAYS TO PERMANENT IMMIGRATION TO THIS COUNTRY, INCREASED SCRUTINY WILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON TEMPORARY VISITORS TO THIS COUNTRY TOO.
ON FEBRUARY 1, 2020 TRUMP SIGNED AN EXECUTIVE ORDER BANNING ALL FOREIGN NATIONALS FROM ENTERING THE US WHO HAD BEEN IN CHINA. THE ORDER CAME INTO EFFECT AT 5PM ON FEBRUARY 2, 2020. TRUMP HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF 『PANICKING』 BY THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE AFFECTED BY THE TRAVEL BAN.
MANILA, PHILIPPINES — HEALTH SECRETARY FRANCISCO DUQUE III ON FRIDAY SAID THAT AUTHORITIES ARE WEIGHING IF THE 2019 CORONAVIRUS OR COVID-19 WARRANTS A TRAVEL BAN ON SINGAPORE.
LOCAL NIGERIAN CATHOLICS STUNNED BY NEW TRAVEL BAN
TEXAS ASKS SUPREME COURT TO REPEAL A CALIFORNIA TRAVEL BAN
NO AMOUNT OF REGULATORY SUBTERFUGE CAN DISGUISE THE BAN』S CLEAR PURPOSE. AS THE BRENNAN CENTER HAS ARGUED IN OUR LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THE TRAVEL BAN, THE PRESIDENT HAS A WELL-DOCUMENTED HISTORY OF SPEWING HATRED AGAINST MUSLIMS, WITHOUT WHICH THE BAN WOULD NOT HAVE EXISTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Mobile | Full
Forum rule | About Us | Contact Info | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statment | Disclaimer | Site Map
Copyright (C) 2020 Suntek Computer Systems Limited. All rights reserved
Disclaimer : In the preparation of this website, 88iv endeavours to offer the most current, correct and clearly expressed information to the public. Nevertheless, inadvertent errors in information and in software may occur. In particular but without limiting anything here, 88iv disclaims any responsibility and accepts no liability (whether in tort, contract or otherwise) for any direct or indirect loss or damage arising from any inaccuracies, omissions or typographical errors that may be contained in this website. 88iv also does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or fitness for purpose of the information contained in this website.