熱門新聞

Duterte "fiercely protective" of PH sovereignty, says Palace @ 2019-09-15T12: 返回 熱門新聞
關鍵詞:arbitral ruling
概念:
“THE PROMPT CLARIFICATION BY FOREIGN AFFAIRS SECRETARY LOCSIN THAT THE PHILIPPINES WAS NOT SETTING ASIDE OR ABANDONING THE ARBITRAL RULING, BEFORE CHINA COULD ACCEPT THE PRESIDENT』S UNILATERAL DECLARATION SETTING ASIDE THE RULING, PREVENTED THE PHILIPPINES FROM BEING BOUND BY THE PRESIDENT』S UNILATERAL DECLARATION. WE SHOULD BE THANKFUL TO SECRETARY LOCSIN FOR HIS VIGILANCE IN PREVENTING A WAIVER OF OUR SOVEREIGN RIGHTS UNDER THE ARBITRAL RULING,” CARPIO SAID. /MUF
PRESIDENT DUTERTE WILL BE GIVING UP ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IF HE AGREES TO SHELVE THE ARBITRAL RULING IN EXCHANGE FOR AN OIL OR GAS DEAL WITH CHINA. HE WILL REALLY BE GIVING UP AN ARBITRAL RULING THAT DAMAGED OUR NATIONAL INTEREST. I JUST HOPE ALL ITS RULINGS THAT DAMAGED OUR NATIONAL INTEREST CAN BE LEGALLY REVERSED.
READ MORE: RODRIGO DUTERTE XI JINPING BEIJING CHINA ARBITRAL RULING HAGUE RULING SOUTH CHINA SEA WEST PHILIPPINE SEA BILATERAL MEETING
ASKED WHAT HIS PLANS ARE FOLLOWING CHINA’S REJECTION OF THE ARBITRAL RULING, DUTERTE SAID: “QUO VADIS, PHILIPPINES?” (WHERE ARE YOU GOING, PHILIPPINES?)
PALACE: DUTERTE WILL NOT SET ASIDE ARBITRAL RULING ON JOINT OIL EXPLORATION WITH CHINA
MORE IMPORTANTLY FOR THIS DISCUSSION, THE YELLOWS HAVE BEEN ABSOLUTELY QUIET OVER THE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL』S RULING MADE IN CONNECTION WITH THE PHILIPPINES』 「SUBMISSION」 REGARDING REEFS OCCUPIED BY CHINA (「DISPOTIF,」 PARAGRAPH 1203, SECTION B (7):
A PROTESTER STANDS OUTSIDE THE CHINESE CONSULATE IN MAKATI CITY DURING A RALLY ON FRIDAY MARKING THE THIRD ANNIVERSARY OF THE HAGUE ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL RULING THAT REJECTED BEIJING』S EXPANSIVE CLAIMS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA, IN A LANDMARK CASE BROUGHT BY MANILA IN 2013. —LYN RILLON
THE EPISODE WOULD BE REALLY HILARIOUS IF NOT FOR ITS VERY SERIOUS IMPACT ON OUR REPUBLIC』S TERRITORY. THE BUNGLING DUO THOUGHT THEY COULD FORCE CHINA OUT OF OUR EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE (EEZ) BY FILING THE ARBITRATION CASE, INVOKING THE UNCLOS. INSTEAD, ONE CONSEQUENCE IS THAT IF WE COMPLY WITH THE ARBITRAL RULING, WE』D HAVE TO GIVE UP OUR KIG. AND WE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO HAVE TO COMPLY WITH IT, AS CHINA REFUSED TO RECOGNIZE THE TRIBUNAL, AND ITS RULING DOESN』T APPLY TO ANY OTHER NATION.
"OUR INDEPENDENT FOREIGN POLICY, SO CALLED, WHICH ALIENATED A LOT OF FRIENDS AND ALLIES, IN A WAY ISOLATED AND WEAKENED OUR POSITION BECAUSE NOW WE MAY NOT HAVE ENOUGH SUPPORT FROM THOSE FRIENDS AND ALLIES WHEN IT COMES TO THE ARBITRAL RULING. ALSO, IN TERMS OF CREDIBILITY, IT DEFINITELY WOULD HAVE SUFFERED SOME BECAUSE WE WERE SO STRONG IN TRYING TO BUILD UP SUPPORT PRIOR TO 2016 AND THEN AFTERWARD, WE SUDDENLY DROPPED IT. THAT MAKES IT HARDER TO USE THE ARBITRAL RULING AS LEVERAGE."
TAIWAN WAS OUTRAGED, AND DECLARED THAT IT DOESN』T RECOGNIZE THE ARBITRAL RULING, AS IT REDUCED TAIPING, THE BIGGEST ISLAND (46 HECTARES) IN THE SPRATLYS WITH AN AIRPORT AND RESORT HOTEL, TO A ROCK, AND DOES NOT HAVE AN EEZ

 

易發投資 | 首頁 |  登錄
流動版 | 完全版
論壇守則 | 關於我們 | 聯繫方式 | 服務條款 | 私隱條款 | 免責聲明
版權所有 不得轉載 (C) 2025
Suntek Computer Systems Limited.